> ....which can be easily inadvertently configured to trap legitimate > abuse reports from ever reaching the mail server.
Please find me more thant 10 legitimate abuse reports that come from real human fingers and are not generated by some ridiculous "intrustion dectection" or auto-mail-to-abuse@ thing that were mailed to postmaster@IP_ADDRESS. > > It's possible that many alloweddomains users are unaware of the RFC > requirement, so would not think to add their IPs. I'm sure most users are not aware of that part of the RFC, and would not add their IP's - especially because they don't want to receive all the spam directed to it which is why they run spamd. I for one will not put them there, because doing so is just silly. nothing legitimate ever mails to such addresses, or if they do they have enough brains to mail the domain, or the owner of the IP block. > > Maybe this could be limited to greylist a few configurable addresses, > trapping unlisted junk. > Yes, that is what the SPAMTRAP feature in spamdb is for. It does exactly that, and as documented, traps a single mail address.. As documented, spamd.alloweddomains traps anything not in the alloweddomains file. If you don't like that feature, please do not use it.
