On 05/12/14 19:25, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2014, RD Thrush wrote:
>> I use this box mostly w/amd64 -current.  I boot in i386 appx. weekly to 
>> do a partial dpb bulk build.  I don't use tmpfs (or mfs) in i386 mode.  
>> I do the dpb builds (both i386 and amd64) w/ chroot.  This is the first 
>> time I've encountered this problem.  Let me know if I can help further.
> 
> "dpb builds w/ chroot"?  I seem to recall that espie (or sthen?) had found 
> that that led to panics.  Or was that was a different meaning of "dpb 
> builds w/ chroot"?

I've not noticed any panics within the past several months.  Although I have 
scripting around the dpb invocation, I essentially run dpb on an amd64 host as 
follows:
dpb -s -A i386 -c -R -u -J 0 -X pkg_info-qPa.all -h dpb_hosts.i386 -f 8 -D 
SYSLOG -P i386-combined.pkg_info-qPa

where "dpb_hosts.i386" contains:
DEFAULT timeout=10 stuck=1000 memory=200M arch=i386
STARTUP=/home/rd/OpenBSD/build/packages/dpb_start
rd@i7v32 sf=2 memory=400M jobs=1 arch=i386
rd@a8v2 jobs=8 chroot=/dpb memory=400M sf=14 arch=i386

a8v2 is the machine that prompted the sendbug report.

The dpb_start STARTUP script mounts "/usr" and "/usr/local" rw while my dpb 
wrapper mounts those filesystems ro upon completion.

NB: I intermittently see what I consider nfs non-reproducible nfs timeout 
issues (on both arches) and the dpb scripting is my effort to capture enough 
data make a sensible dpb report,

Reply via email to