On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:51:10AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> Indeed. Understand that patches are signed using an offline key. It
> does not speak to the internet. We are not invoking
> a manual process to change a minor typo, and have even one person lose
> any sleep over repatching systems because
> the patch signature changed. While I realize it may offend you sense
> of pedantics, doing otherwise is simply silly.
Also, a patch without typoe is likely not authentic. Same hold for my posts,
-Otto
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Tobias Ulmer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 03:34:56PM +0100, Martin Haufschild wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I don't want to be pedantic, but the typing error is still there.
> >
> > Please accept that we're not using our precious time to re-issue a
> > signed patch for a minor typo. It's just not worth it.
> >
> >>
> >> Am 10.12.2014 um 22:50 schrieb Martin Haufschild:
> >> >There is a little bug here:
> >> >http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/5.6/common/014_xserver.patch.sig
> >> >
> >> >Line 4 should be:
> >> >OpenBSD 5.6 errata 14, December 9, 2014:
> >> >
> >> >not:
> >> >OpenBSD 5.5 errata 14, December 9, 2014:
> >>
> >
