No problem, I just wondered for no reaction after the first time I wrote
the email. If I could, I would correct the typo myself.
I didn't have the patch signature in mind. That indeed makes it a little
bit complicated and I confirm it's not worth the time.
Nonetheless, thank you (the complete team) for your work on OpenBSD. I
really appreciate that. I guess most people don't appreciate that, even
most linux users or other BSD users. I have talked to some of them and
even when I told them about the security mechanisms in comparison to
their OS they mostly don't value it.
Best regards
Am 22.03.2015 um 16:53 schrieb Otto Moerbeek:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:51:10AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
Indeed. Understand that patches are signed using an offline key. It
does not speak to the internet. We are not invoking
a manual process to change a minor typo, and have even one person lose
any sleep over repatching systems because
the patch signature changed. While I realize it may offend you sense
of pedantics, doing otherwise is simply silly.
Also, a patch without typoe is likely not authentic. Same hold for my posts,
-Otto
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Tobias Ulmer <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 03:34:56PM +0100, Martin Haufschild wrote:
Hello,
I don't want to be pedantic, but the typing error is still there.
Please accept that we're not using our precious time to re-issue a
signed patch for a minor typo. It's just not worth it.
Am 10.12.2014 um 22:50 schrieb Martin Haufschild:
There is a little bug here:
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/5.6/common/014_xserver.patch.sig
Line 4 should be:
OpenBSD 5.6 errata 14, December 9, 2014:
not:
OpenBSD 5.5 errata 14, December 9, 2014:
