On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:17:20PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:39:12 +0100, > Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:40:35AM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > > all of this seems like a strong indicator that the issue is inside iwx > > > > I have no idea what causes the latency spikes you are seeing, and > > none of the info you've provided so far helps finding an answer. > > > > Meanwhile, I was adble to reproduce latency issue. It occures only when CPU > is loaded by something, and machine is working in low performance mode > (400 Mhz).
Ah ok. Then the advice would be "don't do that", or run it in 11a mode instead of 11ac ;) > Thus, I made one more attempt with your patch during my tests, and I can't > reproduce the issue with not traffic with enabled rate control anymore. > > Perhabs I was made something wrong last time when I've tried it. That is good news, thank you. This patch has already been committed since it didn't cause problems in my own testing and definitely looked like a bug fix. > I applogize to misslead you. No worries. > Anyway, I'll keep debug enabled for the case if frimeware error happens. Yes, that would still be interesting, thanks.
