Amar Takhar commented on a discussion on 
cpukit/rtems/src/rtemsobjectgetapiclassname.c: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/237#note_112449

 > -  { "Period",                  OBJECTS_RTEMS_PERIODS, 0},
 > -  { "Extension",               OBJECTS_RTEMS_EXTENSIONS, 0},
 > -  { "Barrier",                 OBJECTS_RTEMS_BARRIERS, 0},
 > -  { NULL,                      0, 0}
 > +  { "Task", OBJECTS_RTEMS_TASKS, 0 },
 > +  { "Timer", OBJECTS_RTEMS_TIMERS, 0 },
 > +  { "Semaphore", OBJECTS_RTEMS_SEMAPHORES, 0 },
 > +  { "Message Queue", OBJECTS_RTEMS_MESSAGE_QUEUES, 0 },
 > +  { "Partition", OBJECTS_RTEMS_PARTITIONS, 0 },
 > +  { "Region", OBJECTS_RTEMS_REGIONS, 0 },
 > +  { "Port", OBJECTS_RTEMS_PORTS, 0 },
 > +  { "Period", OBJECTS_RTEMS_PERIODS, 0 },
 > +  { "Extension", OBJECTS_RTEMS_EXTENSIONS, 0 },
 > +  { "Barrier", OBJECTS_RTEMS_BARRIERS, 0 },
 > +  { NULL, 0, 0 }
 >  };

@sebhub that's a good point thanks.  I'd still be OK with trying it and see 
what happens if we do end up triggering a lot of spurious changes we can 
disable it but at least if the first pass is good we can leave that in.  But 
arguably if it's triggering other changes wouldn't those be ones that should be 
done by hand, anyway?  It's not a big deal to disable it if it doesn't work out.

-- 
View it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/237#note_112449
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


_______________________________________________
bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs

Reply via email to