Sebastian Huber commented on a discussion on cpukit/rtems/src/taskconstruct.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/237#note_112466 > static User_extensions_Control _RTEMS_tasks_User_extensions = { > .Callouts = { > #if defined( RTEMS_MULTIPROCESSING ) > - .thread_terminate = _RTEMS_tasks_Terminate_extension, > + .thread_terminate = _RTEMS_tasks_Terminate_extension, > #endif > - .thread_start = _RTEMS_tasks_Start_extension, > - .thread_restart = _RTEMS_tasks_Start_extension > + .thread_start = _RTEMS_tasks_Start_extension, > + .thread_restart = _RTEMS_tasks_Start_extension Yes, I would rather lose a couple of good formatting changes if there are several bad ones. This alignment stuff is a lot more complex in the tool since it has to consider several lines to make decisions. This could lead to a continuous maintenance effort. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/237#note_112466 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
