Amar Takhar commented on a discussion: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/965#note_140731


You were made aware we talked about it during a meeting more than once. In fact 
the last time we talked about it was last month and I explicitly said that I 
wanted to wait until. 8.1 so I could finish the tool then out of nowhere this 
mad dash to make it happen for 7.1 started.  I'm far more confused as to why 
this has happened.  Nothing in the CI uses hardcoded files this happened last 
year when you yourself explicitly refused the ability to push to CI configs.  I 
offered an out-of-band solution which was accepted this makes this change even 
more baffling.

`rtems-ci-stage` if you download this tool and run it will download the config 
files though it's currently broken due to the AI bot blocker I'm working on a 
solution for that:

```
/data/tools/rtems-ci-stage -a
 VERSION:  1.0.0 
 codespell : config/codespell/codespellrc  -->  .codespellrc 
 codespell : config/codespell/dictionary.txt  -->  .gitlab/dictionary.txt 
 codespell : config/codespell/ignore_words.txt  -->  .gitlab/ignore_words.txt 
 clang-format : config/clang/clang-format  -->  .clang-format 
 yapf : config/yapf/style.yapf  -->  .style.yapf 
 mdformat : config/mdformat/mdformat.toml  -->  .mdformat.toml 
 yamlfmt : config/yamlfmt/yamlfmt.yml  -->  .yamlfmt.yml 
```

You will need to run this tool regardless if you want to run any local tools 
including `clang-format` as it's the only way to get the parent `.clang-format` 
file.  There's no sense in having files littered everywhere I can tell you that 
CI won't use them and neither with `rtems-format` as I want everything to use 
the same method for configuring the tools.

This isn't the first time I brought up this tool or it's usage.

-- 
View it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/965#note_140731
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


_______________________________________________
bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs

Reply via email to