YASH BHIWANIA commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5434#note_142162 Thanks, @rurban! I appreciate the go-ahead. That makes sense—I definitely want to avoid the "headache" of platform inconsistencies you mentioned. To address @joel's concern about GCC potentially falling back to missing external symbols, I plan to implement a tiered fallback strategy in `safeclib`: **Configure Check:** First, check if the system provides `isinf` / `isinfl`. **Compiler Check:** If not, try using `__builtin_isinf` (if the compiler confirms it can be inlined). **Hard Fallback:** As a failsafe, I'll implement a local helper that checks the IEEE 754 exponent bits directly. This should guarantee it works on RTEMS (and other bare-metal targets) without forcing a dependency on Newlib updates. I will include this detailed plan in my GSoC proposal soon as well ! -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5434#note_142162 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
