Actually there is one other thought I wanted to state before sending, so I'll state it now. Just because a problem can be worked around via some other solution, in this case a firewall, does not relieve venders from the obligation to fix something. Sure, they can use the interim solution to buy them time to actually FIX the problem, but NOT to escape the responsibility to fix it. -- David D.W. Downey - RHCE Consulting Engineer Ensim Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack... Perry Harrington
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP ... ddowney
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP... Perry Harrington
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in... Ben Laurie
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing fla... Perry Harrington
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routin... Ben Laurie
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in... Dan Harkless
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP ... ddowney
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP ... John Cronin
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack... Neil W Rickert
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP ... Ben Laurie
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP... David Litchfield
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in... Robert Collins
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in... Lincoln Yeoh
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP ... Lars Mathiesen
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack... Lothar Beta
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP ... David Damerell