Ted Neward wrote: > Having installed the patched make, and having installed all of Cygwin, I > then run "j2se/make/jdk_generic_profile.sh" and "cd control/make && make > sanity" from a fresh bash prompt, and I get: > > sanity-rules.gmk:64: *** multiple target patterns. Stop. > > ? Is this another bad-environment problem?
Ted, I believe this is the problem referred to below. > You should not need to build GNU make, however there is an issue with 3.80 > on Windows where it doesn't work, due to it not accepting C:/ style paths. > See > http://weblogs.java.net/blog/kellyohair/archive/2007/01/jdk_builds_on_w.ht > ml > Download a patched cygwin make binary from > http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe Cygwin made a major controversial change to their make binary that causes make to no longer work with the JDK builds, or with any makefiles that use C:/FOO style paths. Martin > > Ted Neward > Java, .NET, XML Services > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > http://www.tedneward.com > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 10:11 AM >>To: Ted Neward >>Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net >>Subject: Re: State of the build on Windows? >> >>See the Build README: >> >> >>https://openjdk.dev.java.net/source/browse/*checkout*/openjdk/jdk/trunk/RE >>ADME-builds.html >> >>A few comments below. >> >>Ted Neward wrote: >>>You're right--I didn't give you much to go on. Here's where I'm at right >>>now. >>> >>>I pulled down the latest SVN sources, fresh checkout from the trunk. >>> >>>I have MSVS 2003 installed on the box, no problems there. >>> >>>I can build the Hotspot JVM itself using the hotspot build files, no >>>problems there with any of the debug/fastdebug/product >>>tiered/core/compiler1/compiler2 combinations. Everybody happy. >>> >>>Trying to build the larger build (OpenJDK as a whole) yields problems. >>> >>>I had Cygwin on my system, with (I think) all the tools I needed from >>there >>>as part of the install. (Is there a definitive list? I've seen some >>>what-seem-to-be-conflicting lists.) >>See the BUILD README. For sure you need the cygwin 'make', awk, ksh, and >>more, the list should be in the openjdk build readme. >>I myself just download all of cygwin, which takes a long time but >>then I never have to worry about not having something >> >>>I pulled down GNU Make 3.80, built it using MSVC 2003, and both its >>>"batched" and "cygwin" modes gave me problems, the first with >>CreateProcess >>>failures, the second with shell execution failures. I think this is a >>red >>>herring, which is why I'm not giving you the lists of error reports. >>> >>You should not need to build GNU make, however there is an issue with 3.80 >>on Windows where it doesn't work, due to it not accepting C:/ style paths. >>See >>http://weblogs.java.net/blog/kellyohair/archive/2007/01/jdk_builds_on_w.ht >>ml >>Download a patched cygwin make binary from >>http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe >> >>And this is important: Start your 'make' from a cygwin shell window, NOT a >>Windows command window. >> >> >>>Interestingly, I don't even get to the t2k.lib problem, because when I >>>pulled down the binary plugs for Windows, I got what appears to be a >>>complete JDK 7 build, and *not* the necessary pieces to build it. >>> >>That is how the binary plugs are delivered right now, a jdk7 image. >>We are working on sparse binary plugs. >> >>>By the way, as a workaround, I *think* one can use the import library >>tool >>>that ships with MSVS2003 to build the t2k.lib (if it's just an import >>>library for t2k.dll) to get around this problem--this is what I was >>trying >>>to verify when I ran into the larger issues. >>If you can create a .lib file from a .dll, that should work, I didn't >>spend >>much time looking into this idea, wasn't sure how reliable it was. >> >>>I'm hoping that Dan (or anyone else who has successfully built the >>Windows >>>build) can help walk me through some of the setup and build issues...? I >>>realize it's a lot to ask, but I'm hoping to take the experiences here >>and >>>document them all in a white paper for popular consumption. >>> >>Look at the BUILD Readme first. Then get 'make sanity' to pass. >>Unfortunately without a t2k.lib, you won't get past the sanity check. >> >>>So I guess my questions, in order, are: >>>(*) Do we have a complete list of tools necessary to build on Windows? >>So I >>>can verify I have all the tools necessary? >>>(*) Can somebody send me a GNU Make for Windows that works for them, so >>I >>>can make sure it's not my weirdo-built version that's breaking? >>>(*) Can somebody please verify that the version of the binary plugs for >>>Window on the Sun site is correct and suitable for building? If it is, >>can >>>you send me the URL to pull it down (because I obviously grabbed the >>wrong >>>one)? If it's not, send me one that is? >>>(*) If I need to customize my build environment, is >>>j2se/make/jdk_generic_profile.sh the file to modify, or should I create >>a >>>customized one (based on jdk_generic_profile.sh) and use that? What's >>going >>>to work best with future changes to the build infrastructure? >>> >>>I've read the README several times, but I find myself still stuck. :-/ >>I'm wondering if you have read the right README. What README are you >>refering too? >> >>-kto >> >>>Ted Neward >>>Java, .NET, XML Services >>>Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing >>>http://www.tedneward.com >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 5:14 PM >>>>To: Ted Neward >>>>Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net >>>>Subject: Re: State of the build on Windows? >>>> >>>>Ted, >>>> >>>>You haven't given me anything to go on here, but I assume the t2k.lib >>>>problem is still going to block you on Windows. >>>> >>>>There are two efforts going on right now with regards to t2k.lib. >>>>The awt team is trying to get rid of our dependence on t2k in the >>OpenJDK, >>>>effectively one less plug. >>>> >>>>And I and a few others have also been trying to re-configure the binary >>>>plug >>>>download bundles to be smaller, sparse, legally self defining, include >>the >>>>t2k.lib, >>>>and be automatically built by the Makefiles on every formal promotion >>>>build. >>>> >>>>Since this changes the legal documents, it's taken longer than I had >>>>thought it would. I am not a lawyer, so I won't speak to the specific >>>>legal issues here. We tried for B14 then B15, couldn't get all the >>>>issues resolved in time, and also do all the test builds as we have to >>>>repeatedly merge and re-merge these changes. >>>>We didn't want to break the jdk7 product or the OpenJDK with these >>>>changes. >>>>Hopefully everything will be in place for B16 for the new binary plugs, >>>>which will help all platforms, but will include t2k.lib. >>>>But I can't promise B16, we are trying very hard to get it into B16. >>>> >>>>But t2k.lib doesn't have long to live, the awt team is progressing very >>>>well on removing our dependence on it. Which is the best solution of >>>>course. >>>> >>>>I apologize for how long this is taking, but we are trying to get it >>>>right, >>>>or as right as possible. Once these binary plug changes are in place, >>>>I'll send an email to the discuss and build alias with details, but >>>>more importantly, we will be able to add/subtract (hopefully only >>>>subtract) >>>>from the binary plugs as we go, without detailed legal review, or at >>>>least that's the goal. >>>> >>>>-kto >>>> >>>>Ted Neward wrote: >>>>>I get some conflicting input regarding the state of the build on a >>>>>Windows box. Kelly’s blog of May 2007 implies that it’s broken; is >>that >>>>>still the case? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Beyond that, I have Cygwin and VS2003 installed on my box, and I >>pulled >>>>>down and built GNU make 3.80. Things still seem to be kinda broken at >>a >>>>>fundamental level, though—is there anything else I need to do (env >>vars, >>>>>etc) that would need to be set? For example, the makefiles seem to >>want >>>>>to use a default temp directory of C:\Documents and Settings\Ted\Local >>>>>Settings\... which obviously has spaces in it; is this supposed to be >>>>>corrected somewhere? Where’s the best place to override these >>settings? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Ted Neward >>>>> >>>>>Java, .NET, XML Services >>>>> >>>>>Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing >>>>> >>>>>http://www.tedneward.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>No virus found in this outgoing message. >>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>>>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.4/896 - Release Date: >>>>>7/11/2007 4:09 PM >>>>> >>>>No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.5/899 - Release Date: >>7/13/2007 >>>>3:41 PM >>>> >>>No virus found in this outgoing message. >>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.5/899 - Release Date: >>7/13/2007 >>>3:41 PM >>> >>> >>No virus found in this incoming message. >>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.6/902 - Release Date: 7/15/2007 >>2:21 PM >> > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.6/902 - Release Date: 7/15/2007 > 2:21 PM > >
