Related question: according to make sanity, it now looks for FindBugs, but I don't find anything in the make README that describes why, or where to put the FindBugs stuff.... When did this get added? B19 or 20? Is it going to remain a part of the build going forward?
Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing http://www.tedneward.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:build-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Neward > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 3:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Makefile patch needed when building the b20 OpenJDK source > drop > > Exactly. It might be a nice way around the binary plugs for those who > don't > care about that stuff. > > Ted Neward > Java, .NET, XML Services > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 12:21 PM > > To: Ted Neward > > Cc: 'Christian Thalinger'; [email protected]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Makefile patch needed when building the b20 OpenJDK > source > > drop > > > > Good question... I'll explore that possibility, warn that no plugs > are > > available but build as much as possible kind of thing, right? > > > > -kto > > > > Ted Neward wrote: > > > No promises heard, no expectations understood. :-) > > > > > > I personally have a hard time following the argument that says that > > "because > > > we put them into our source repository, we're asserting some kind > of > > legal > > > license ownership" or something, but hey, I'm not a lawyer, either. > > :-/ > > > > > > Here's a Really Dumb Question(TM): Is it possible (and then, is it > > > practical) to create a build that doesn't use any of the binary > plugs > > stuff? > > > A stripped-down, JVM-and-core-classes-only kind of build that just > > uses the > > > core stuff that's out in the Sun-blessed open source domain? (I > > haven't > > > found that I cared about any of the binary plugs-related stuff yet, > > so...) > > > > > > Ted Neward > > > Java, .NET, XML Services > > > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > > > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 8:12 PM > > >> To: Ted Neward > > >> Cc: 'Christian Thalinger'; [email protected]; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Subject: Re: Makefile patch needed when building the b20 OpenJDK > > source > > >> drop > > >> > > >> I would love for these binary plugs to go away, and second best, > > make > > >> them trivially available, but we are in legal territory here. > > >> I will bring up this issue and see if we can't do what you > suggest, > > >> but I am not a lawyer, no promises. > > >> > > >> They are a royal pain, no argument there. > > >> > > >> -kto > > >> > > >> Ted Neward wrote: > > >>> If they're going to change with every build release, then it's > even > > >> MORE > > >>> important to make sure they're in some kind of source repository. > > >> Otherwise, > > >>> the whole point of keeping it in a source-code control repository > > >>> (rollbacks, check out to a label, and so on) goes completely out > > the > > >> window > > >>> when I can't get the corresponding binary plugs. > > >>> > > >>> I can't be the only one who grew up under the rule of source > > control > > >> that > > >>> states, "Everything necessary to create a build must be stored in > > the > > >> source > > >>> repository", can I? > > >>> > > >>> Ted Neward > > >>> Java, .NET, XML Services > > >>> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > > >>> http://www.tedneward.com > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> -----Original Message----- > > >>>> From: Christian Thalinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 2:03 AM > > >>>> To: Ted Neward > > >>>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > > >>>> Subject: RE: Makefile patch needed when building the b20 OpenJDK > > >> source > > >>>> drop > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 23:40 -0700, Ted Neward wrote: > > >>>>> If they can't rest in the same repository, then perhaps a > > different > > >>>>> repository? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I'm just looking to be able to do a "svn up" (or its Mercurial > > >>>> equivalent) > > >>>>> and know that I've got everything I need to build the OpenJDK; > > it's > > >> a > > >>>> lot > > >>>>> more tedious to "svn up" then fetch the latest binary plugs > > >>>> (particularly > > >>>>> since I'm betting they're not going to change as frequently as > > the > > >>>> source > > >>>>> does), and only then do a build. > > >>>> That's wrong. Every source build has it's matching binary plug. > > >> See: > > >>>> http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/ > > >>>> > > >>>> - twisti > > >>>> > > >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. > > >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > >>>> Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release > Date: > > >>>> 9/20/2007 12:07 PM > > >>>> > > >>> No virus found in this outgoing message. > > >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > >>> Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date: > > >> 9/20/2007 > > >>> 12:07 PM > > >>> > > >>> > > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > >> Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date: > > >> 9/20/2007 12:07 PM > > >> > > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date: > > 9/20/2007 > > > 12:07 PM > > > > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date: > > 9/20/2007 12:07 PM > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date: > 9/20/2007 > 12:07 PM > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.28/1021 - Release Date: > 9/21/2007 2:02 PM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.33/1034 - Release Date: 9/27/2007 5:00 PM
