Martin Buchholz wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 02:50, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Martin Buchholz wrote: >> Well, maintaining this "buffer" forest is, more or less, what IcedTea does. >> I'm not sure that we need another one. > > I wasn't suggesting we start a new buffer forest. > I was suggesting we (Google + IcedTea) > consider sharing the forest at http://openjdk.java.net/projects/icedtea/. > even though Google's patches didn't originate in IcedTea proper.
That's an excellent plan. Andrew.
