On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 02:50, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > Martin Buchholz wrote: > Well, maintaining this "buffer" forest is, more or less, what IcedTea does. > I'm not sure that we need another one.
I wasn't suggesting we start a new buffer forest. I was suggesting we (Google + IcedTea) consider sharing the forest at http://openjdk.java.net/projects/icedtea/. even though Google's patches didn't originate in IcedTea proper. Martin
