Hello, please review :
mostly I added JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places where the win32bit build
missed it .
A difference is
Where I removed a few declarations (one decl with one without JNIEXPORT
/ JNICALL – looked a bit strange ) .
Best regards , Matthias
From: Magnus Ihse Bursie [mailto:magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 5. April 2018 17:45
To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baes...@sap.com>
Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org; Doerr, Martin <martin.do...@sap.com>
Subject: Re: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function
That's most likely a result of the new JNIEXPORT I added as part of the mapfile
I tried to match header file and C file, but I can certainly have missed cases.
If I didn't get any warnings, it was hard to know what I missed.
Please do submit your patch.
I'm a bit surprised 32-bit Window is still buildable. :)
5 apr. 2018 kl. 17:20 skrev Baesken, Matthias
Hello, we noticed that at a number of places in the coding , the
JNIEXPORT and/or JNICALL modifiers do not match when one compares the
The implementation of functions.
While this is ok on most platforms, it seems to fail on Windows 32 bit and
leads to errors like this one :
: error C2373: 'j2d_mlib_ImageConvKernelConvert' : redefinition; different
: see declaration of 'j2d_mlib_ImageConvKernelConvert'
(there are quite a few of these e.g. in mlib / splashscreen etc.)
Another example is this one :
diff -r 4d98473ed33e src/java.base/share/native/libjimage/jimage.hpp
--- a/src/java.base/share/native/libjimage/jimage.hpp Thu Apr 05 09:55:16 2018
+++ b/src/java.base/share/native/libjimage/jimage.hpp Thu Apr 05
17:07:40 2018 +0200
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
* JImageLocationRef location = (*JImageFindResource)(image,
* "java.base", "9.0",
-extern "C" JNIEXPORT JImageLocationRef JIMAGE_FindResource(JImageFile* jimage,
+extern "C" JNIEXPORT JImageLocationRef JNICALL JIMAGE_FindResource(JImageFile*
const char* module_name, const char* version, const char* name,
Is there some generic way to get the same declarations / impementations in
the code ?
Or should I just add a patch with my findings ?
Best regards, Matthias