On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:50 AM, dalibor topic <dalibor.to...@oracle.com> wrote:
> > For example, if someone sufficiently qualified decided to make future JDK > 10 updates buildable using the full range of JDK 1.0 - JDK 10, as Martin > seemingly suggests, they could pursue that effort as future JDK 10 update > maintainers instead of trying to make it work and keep it working in the > faster paced mainline jdk/jdk development tree. > I think this is something where the project as a whole needs a policy. People working on a project all have to agree on what programming language they're using. I like the "last LTS" rule, and I'm still hoping the openjdk project will have well-defined LTS releases.
