Vladimir,

we can introduce 'quick' keyword, mark these tests w/ them and use this keyword 
in test selection. I personally don't like this way either, as it uses a 
loosely defined property. it also might be possible to create a separate test 
group file and use it to define only _quick groups. I'll look into these and 
other possible options.

in any case, although it will create a temporary mess, I'd prefer not to change 
how we define these *_quick test groups or how we do test selection, until all 
vm testbase tests are open sourced as it might create unneeded complications w/ 
test execution. I'll file an RFE to not forget about it.

Thanks,
-- Igor  

> On May 2, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.koz...@oracle.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I wish we have ability to include other files with definitions into 
> TEST.group file. It is very ugly to double size of TEST.group file just for 
> that purpose.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
> 
> On 5/1/18 9:39 PM, Igor Ignatev wrote:
>> Vladimir,
>> Tests are listed only in _quick test group b/c it doesn’t include all tests 
>> from the directory. We use this group in some of our test configurations, 
>> and :vmTestbase_nsk_monitoring in others. vmTestbase_nsk_monitoring is 
>> defined by the directory as other groups.
>> Thanks,
>> — Igor
>>> On May 1, 2018, at 7:54 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.koz...@oracle.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Igor,
>>> 
>>> Why you need to list each test in TEST.groups and not just directory as we 
>>> do in other cases?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vladimir
>>> 
>>>> On 5/1/18 7:10 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8199375/webrev.00/index.html
>>>>> 41276 lines changed: 41274 ins; 1 del; 1 mod;
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> could you please review the patch which open sources monitoring tests from 
>>>> vm testbase?
>>>> The tests were developed to test hotspot related JMX functionality. as w/ 
>>>> common VM testbase code, these tests are old, they have been run from 
>>>> hotspot testing for a long period of time. originally, these tests were 
>>>> run by a test harness different from jtreg and had different build and 
>>>> execution schemes, some parts couldn't be easily translated to jtreg, so 
>>>> tests might have actions or pieces of code which look weird. in a long 
>>>> term, we are planning to rework them.
>>>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199375
>>>> webrev:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8199375/webrev.00/index.html
>>>> testing: vmTestbase_nsk_monitoring test group
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -- Igor

Reply via email to