Yes, it is indeed. I recognize that now. /Erik
On 2018-09-25 08:49, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 25/09/2018 16:43, Erik Joelsson wrote:At Oracle, I'm pretty sure we need to maintain the current behavior so that patch needs to be accompanied by a corresponding patch in Oracle closed.Is this the same issue as JDK-8044235 that Omair fixed in JDK 9: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/5cab03c4e5f9 -Alan
