On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 08:52 -0700, Erik Joelsson wrote: > Yes, it is indeed. I recognize that now. > > /Erik > > > On 2018-09-25 08:49, Alan Bateman wrote: > > > > > > On 25/09/2018 16:43, Erik Joelsson wrote: > > > At Oracle, I'm pretty sure we need to maintain the current behavior > > > so that patch needs to be accompanied by a corresponding patch in > > > Oracle closed. > > > > Is this the same issue as JDK-8044235 that Omair fixed in JDK 9: > > > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/5cab03c4e5f9 > > > > -Alan
Nice find! Thanks, Alan. I'm going to propose that as a backport. Cheers, Severin
