(Also, for build changes there are no hard and fast rules about reviews like in Hotspot. A single review is typically okay.)
/Magnus > 13 dec. 2018 kl. 16:34 skrev Magnus Ihse Bursie > <magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>: > > Yes. > > /Magnus > >> 13 dec. 2018 kl. 16:02 skrev Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@redhat.com>: >> >> Thanks! >> >> I would like to consider it trivial. Build system devs, are you good with >> this? >> >> -Aleksey >> >>> On 12/13/18 3:30 PM, Roman Kennke wrote: >>> ok by me. Thanks! >>> Roman >>> >>>> Am 13.12.18 um 14:58 schrieb Aleksey Shipilev: >>>> Bug; >>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215356 >>>> >>>> There are lots of hotspot/tier1 tests on x86_32 caused by Shenandoah. This >>>> mode is experimental, and >>>> we can disable it without prejudice to make tests clean. Once x86_32 >>>> support is fixed, we can >>>> re-enable it back. >>>> >>>> Fix: >>>> >>>> diff -r 748cab25d902 -r f9d158363d15 make/autoconf/hotspot.m4 >>>> --- a/make/autoconf/hotspot.m4 Thu Dec 13 14:39:16 2018 +0100 >>>> +++ b/make/autoconf/hotspot.m4 Thu Dec 13 14:48:30 2018 +0100 >>>> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ >>>> >>>> # Only enable Shenandoah on supported arches >>>> AC_MSG_CHECKING([if shenandoah can be built]) >>>> - if test "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU_ARCH" = "xx86" || test >>>> "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU" = "xaarch64" ; then >>>> + if test "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU" = "xx86_64" || test >>>> "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU" = "xaarch64" ; then >>>> AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) >>>> else >>>> DISABLED_JVM_FEATURES="$DISABLED_JVM_FEATURES shenandoahgc" >>>> >>>> Testing: x86_64 tier1_gc_shenandoah, x86_32 hotspot/tier1. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Aleksey >> >> >