Noted. Pushed.
Thanks! -Aleksey On 12/13/18 4:36 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > (Also, for build changes there are no hard and fast rules about reviews like > in Hotspot. A single review is typically okay.) > > /Magnus > >> 13 dec. 2018 kl. 16:34 skrev Magnus Ihse Bursie >> <magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>: >> >> Yes. >> >> /Magnus >> >>> 13 dec. 2018 kl. 16:02 skrev Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@redhat.com>: >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> I would like to consider it trivial. Build system devs, are you good with >>> this? >>> >>> -Aleksey >>> >>>> On 12/13/18 3:30 PM, Roman Kennke wrote: >>>> ok by me. Thanks! >>>> Roman >>>> >>>>> Am 13.12.18 um 14:58 schrieb Aleksey Shipilev: >>>>> Bug; >>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215356 >>>>> >>>>> There are lots of hotspot/tier1 tests on x86_32 caused by Shenandoah. >>>>> This mode is experimental, and >>>>> we can disable it without prejudice to make tests clean. Once x86_32 >>>>> support is fixed, we can >>>>> re-enable it back. >>>>> >>>>> Fix: >>>>> >>>>> diff -r 748cab25d902 -r f9d158363d15 make/autoconf/hotspot.m4 >>>>> --- a/make/autoconf/hotspot.m4 Thu Dec 13 14:39:16 2018 +0100 >>>>> +++ b/make/autoconf/hotspot.m4 Thu Dec 13 14:48:30 2018 +0100 >>>>> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ >>>>> >>>>> # Only enable Shenandoah on supported arches >>>>> AC_MSG_CHECKING([if shenandoah can be built]) >>>>> - if test "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU_ARCH" = "xx86" || test >>>>> "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU" = "xaarch64" ; then >>>>> + if test "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU" = "xx86_64" || test >>>>> "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU" = "xaarch64" ; then >>>>> AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) >>>>> else >>>>> DISABLED_JVM_FEATURES="$DISABLED_JVM_FEATURES shenandoahgc" >>>>> >>>>> Testing: x86_64 tier1_gc_shenandoah, x86_32 hotspot/tier1. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> -Aleksey >>> >>> >> >