On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 12:30:02 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> And I can certainly move jdwp.spec to java.base instead. That's the reason I >> need input on this: All I know is that is definitely not the responsibility >> of the Build Group to maintain that document, and I made my best guess at >> where to place it. > >> And I can certainly move jdwp.spec to java.base instead. > > If jdwp.spec has to move to the src tree then src/java.se is probably the > most suitable home because Java SE specifies JDWP as an optional interface. > So nothing to do with java.base and the build will need to continue to > generate the sources for the front-end (jdk.jdi) and back-end > (jdk.jdwp.agent) as they implement the protocol. My understanding of JEPs is that they should be viewed as living documents. In this case, I think it's perfectly valid to update JEP 201 with additional source code layout. Both for this and for the other missing dirs. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1611
