On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:03:08 GMT, Erik Joelsson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> And I can certainly move jdwp.spec to java.base instead.
>>
>> If jdwp.spec has to move to the src tree then src/java.se is probably the
>> most suitable home because Java SE specifies JDWP as an optional interface.
>> So nothing to do with java.base and the build will need to continue to
>> generate the sources for the front-end (jdk.jdi) and back-end
>> (jdk.jdwp.agent) as they implement the protocol.
>
> My understanding of JEPs is that they should be viewed as living documents.
> In this case, I think it's perfectly valid to update JEP 201 with additional
> source code layout. Both for this and for the other missing dirs.
Regarding the chosen layout. Did you consider following the existing pattern of
src/<module>/{share,<OS>}/data?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1611
