On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 11:43:13 GMT, Andrew Haley <a...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Are you sure? At the moment with PAC we get: >> >> patch_pc at address 0x0000fffff58edf98 [0x0068ffffed17b5fc -> >> 0x00abffffed17b7f8] >> >> With both signed and unsigned you'd have: >> >> patch_pc at address 0x0000fffff58edf98 [0x0068ffffed17b5fc >> (0x0000ffffed17b5fc) -> 0x00abffffed17b7f8 (0x0000ffffed17b7f8)] >> >> I prefer the first - it's shorter and you can infer the address from the >> signed version. Happy to go with the longer version if you think the shorter >> version is confusing. > > You've been looking at PAC-signed addresses for a long time. > Let's see "at address [prev true dest -> new true dest] [signed prev signed > dest -> new signed dest]", but only show the signed dests if they're > different. So it appears as > `patch_pc at address 0x0000fffff58edf98 [0x0068ffffed17b5fc -> > 0x00abffffed17b7f8] [signed 0x0000ffffed17b5fc -> 0x0000ffffed17b7f8]` . ok, that looks better than my longer version, I'll go with that ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6334
