On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 01:15:31 GMT, David Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I propose that when a patch touches a file with lossy conversion warnings > > disabled, it should also enable the warnings and fix them for that file. > > This contradicts other common recomendations of not mixing unrelated issues > in the same PR. Fixing style nits is harmless but fixing an actual lossy > conversion issue could itself lead to bugs and unexpected fanout. That's a good point. I think that takes piggybacking on other patches off the table then. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9516
