build-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8278591: Jpackage post installation information message [v3] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8278591: Jpackage post installation information message [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8278591: Jpackage post installation information message Alexey Semenyuk
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v27] Andrew Haley
• RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve Processbuilder error reporting Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8379967: (process) Improve Processbuilder error reporting Thomas Stuefe
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v26] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v26] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v26] Claes Redestad
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v25] Andrew Haley
• RFR: JDK-8379802: unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v2] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v3] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v4] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v4] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v4] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v5] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v5] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v5] Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v5] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header [v5] Thomas Stuefe
  • Integrated: 8379802: [AIX] unify DL_info struct and put it into a single header Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8379425: [windows] headless-only build fails [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379425: [windows] headless-only build fails [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379425: [windows] headless-only build fails [v2] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8379425: [windows,macos] should not allow unsupported headless-only build [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379425: [windows,macos] should not allow unsupported headless-only build [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8379425: Windows and macOS should not allow unsupported headless-only build [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8379425: Windows and macOS should not allow unsupported headless-only build [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379425: [windows,macos] should not allow unsupported headless-only build [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8379425: Windows and macOS should not allow unsupported headless-only build [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379425: [windows,macos] should not allow unsupported headless-only build [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8379425: Windows and macOS should not allow unsupported headless-only build [v2] Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexander Matveev
• Re: RFR: 8357193: [VS 2022 17.14] Warning C5287 in debugInit.c: enum type mismatch during build Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8357193: [VS 2022 17.14] Warning C5287 in debugInit.c: enum type mismatch during build Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8357193: [VS 2022 17.14] Warning C5287 in debugInit.c: enum type mismatch during build Alexey Ivanov
• RFR: 8379416: AIX build fails if system (not GNU) date tool is in PATH Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379416: AIX build fails if system (not GNU) date tool is in PATH Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8379416: AIX build fails if system (not GNU) date tool is in PATH [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379416: AIX build fails if system (not GNU) date tool is in PATH [v2] Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8379416: AIX build fails if system (not GNU) date tool is in PATH [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379416: AIX build fails if system (not GNU) date tool is in PATH [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379416: AIX build fails if system (not GNU) date tool is in PATH [v3] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8379416: AIX build fails if system (not GNU) date tool is in PATH [v3] Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8379416: AIX build fails if system (not GNU) date tool is in PATH [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8379416: AIX build fails if system (not GNU) date tool is in PATH Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8373922: Enhance Taglet API to support relative URLs [v4] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8373922: Enhance Taglet API to support relative URLs [v4] Chen Liang
• [External] : [bsd-port:bsd-port] RFR: Add BSD to autoconf scrips (with checks) Harald Eilertsen
  • Re: [External] : [bsd-port:bsd-port] RFR: Add BSD to autoconf scrips (with checks) Harald Eilertsen
• Re: RFR: 8353290: C2: Refactor PhaseIdealLoop::is_counted_loop() [v40] Kangcheng Xu
  • Re: RFR: 8353290: C2: Refactor PhaseIdealLoop::is_counted_loop() [v40] Kangcheng Xu
• Re: RFR: 8373922: Enhance Taglet API to support relative URLs Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8373922: Enhance Taglet API to support relative URLs Hannes Wallnöfer
• Re: RFR: 8373922: Enhance Taglet API to support relative URLs [v3] Hannes Wallnöfer
• RFR: 8379499: [AIX] headless-only build of libjawt.so fails Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379499: [AIX] headless-only build of libjawt.so fails Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8379499: [AIX] headless-only build of libjawt.so fails Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379499: [AIX] headless-only build of libjawt.so fails Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8379499: [AIX] headless-only build of libjawt.so fails Harald Eilertsen
  • Re: RFR: 8379499: [AIX] headless-only build of libjawt.so fails Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8379499: [AIX] headless-only build of libjawt.so fails Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolette preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolette preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolette preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolette preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolette preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolette preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v3] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v3] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v4] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v4] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded Jan Lahoda
• [External] : Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers Baesken, Matthias
  • [External] : RE: Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers Baesken, Matthias
  • [External] : RE: Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers Baesken, Matthias
  • Re: [External] : RE: Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers Kevin Walls
  • Re: [External] : RE: Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers David Holmes
  • RE: [External] : RE: Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers Baesken, Matthias
  • Re: [External] : RE: Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers Kevin Walls
  • RE: [External] : RE: Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers Baesken, Matthias
  • Re: [External] : RE: Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers David Holmes
  • RE: [External] : RE: Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers Baesken, Matthias
  • Re: [External] : RE: Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers David Holmes
  • Re: [External] : RE: Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers David Holmes
  • RE: [External] : RE: Exporting debug helpers and 8375311: Some builds are missing debug helpers and exporting debug-helpers Baesken, Matthias
• Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v11] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v11] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v11] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v11] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v11] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v11] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v11] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v11] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v11] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v11] Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v24] Andrew Haley
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v23] Andrew Haley
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v22] Andrew Haley
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v21] Andrew Haley
• RFR: 8379202: Support linktime-gc on Linux with clang Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379202: Support linktime-gc on Linux with clang Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8379202: Support linktime-gc on Linux with clang Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379202: Support linktime-gc on Linux with clang Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8379202: Support linktime-gc on Linux with clang Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8379202: Support linktime-gc on Linux with clang Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8379202: Support linktime-gc on Linux with clang Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8379202: Support linktime-gc on Linux with clang Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8379202: Support linktime-gc on Linux with clang Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v6] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
• Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v7] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v7] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v7] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v7] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v7] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v7] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v5] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v5] Tobias Hartmann
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v20] Andrew Haley
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v19] Andrew Haley
• Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v10] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v10] Fei Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v10] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v10] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v10] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v10] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v10] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v10] Yasumasa Suenaga
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v18] Andrew Haley
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v17] Andrew Haley
• Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v9] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8377946: Use DWARF in mixed jstack on Linux AArch64 [v9] Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8378836: Enable linktime-gc by default on Linux ppc64le Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8378836: Enable linktime-gc by default on Linux ppc64le Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8378836: Enable linktime-gc by default on Linux ppc64le Martin Doerr
  • Integrated: 8378836: Enable linktime-gc by default on Linux ppc64le Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8378836: Enable linktime-gc by default on Linux ppc64le Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8378836: Enable linktime-gc by default on Linux ppc64le Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8378836: Enable linktime-gc by default on Linux ppc64le Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8378836: Enable linktime-gc by default on Linux ppc64le Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v16] Andrew Haley
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v15] Andrew Haley
• Re: RFR: 8372701: Randomized profile counters [v14] Andrew Haley
• [External] : [bsd-port:bsd-port] RFR: Add BSD to autoconf scrips Harald Eilertsen
  • Re: [External] : [bsd-port:bsd-port] RFR: Add BSD to autoconf scrips Harald Eilertsen
• RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v2] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v2] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v4] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v4] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v4] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v5] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v5] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v5] Ben Perez
  • Integrated: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size Shawn Emery
• RFR: 8373128: Stack overflow handling for native stack overflows Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8373128: Stack overflow handling for native stack overflows Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8373128: Stack overflow handling for native stack overflows Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8373128: Stack overflow handling for native stack overflows Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8373128: Stack overflow handling for native stack overflows David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373128: Stack overflow handling for native stack overflows Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8373128: Stack overflow handling for native stack overflows David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373128: Stack overflow handling for native stack overflows Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8373128: Stack overflow handling for native stack overflows Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8373128: Stack overflow handling for native stack overflows Yasumasa Suenaga

• Earlier messages
• Later messages