On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 17:08:33 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <djelin...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > And, oh, I must say that I think "clcl" as name for the toolchain is > > really bad. :-( > > It was not my first choice. I tried clang-cl first; the scripts didn't like > the dash. Then I tried clangcl, and some of the changes found their way into > the MacOS build. findstring is tricky to get right. Then we need to fix those places. As Erik has commented, `findstring` is usually the wrong function to use when what you really mean is `filter`. > > we need to design the integration of clang-cl in a way that we can > > (hopefully) reuse existing clang warning disables. > > I'd love that. Got any preferences on how that should be handled? Not straight out of my hat, no. I wonder what would happen as a first step if we started looking at the DISABLE_WARNINGS_clang fields, by just using a hack. I'm guessing this will take some experimenting. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17019#issuecomment-1847960400 PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17019#issuecomment-1847962061