On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 17:08:33 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <djelin...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> >    And, oh, I must say that I think "clcl" as name for the toolchain is 
> > really bad. :-(
>
> It was not my first choice. I tried clang-cl first; the scripts didn't like 
> the dash. Then I tried clangcl, and some of the changes found their way into 
> the MacOS build. findstring is tricky to get right.

Then we need to fix those places. As Erik has commented, `findstring` is 
usually the wrong function to use when what you really mean is `filter`.

> >    we need to design the integration of clang-cl in a way that we can 
> > (hopefully) reuse existing clang warning disables.
> 
> I'd love that. Got any preferences on how that should be handled?

Not straight out of my hat, no. I wonder what would happen as a first step if 
we started looking at the DISABLE_WARNINGS_clang fields, by just using a hack. 
I'm guessing this will take some experimenting.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17019#issuecomment-1847960400
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17019#issuecomment-1847962061

Reply via email to