On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 23:17:29 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > we need to design the integration of clang-cl in a way that we can > > > (hopefully) reuse existing clang warning disables. > > > > > > I'd love that. Got any preferences on how that should be handled? > > Not straight out of my hat, no. I wonder what would happen as a first step if > we started looking at the DISABLE_WARNINGS_clang fields, by just using a > hack. I'm guessing this will take some experimenting. How about having clang-cl be one of the clang names recognized for Windows in addition to regular clang, much like how AIX has ibm-clang_r as its TOOLCHAIN_CC_BINARY_clang rather than the default of just clang? I don't know how clang-cl's options differ from the regular clang however, so I don't know how feasible this approach would be > Julian has been cleaning up some of that, > but I've no idea how much might be left. Quite a bit, I'm afraid ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17019#issuecomment-1850018336
