> According to 
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/26661#issuecomment-3162014034, we should 
> not build gtest with `/EHsc`. 
> 
> I can honestly say I don't fully understand the consequences of this change, 
> but at least it passes building and testing on Oracle CI. And it does seem to 
> make sense that we build the gtest version of libjvm as close as possible to 
> the real version. For libgtest I just thought it was prudent to keep the 
> flags in sync with how we build libjvm. This might not be the correct 
> decision.
> 
> I have not tested how or if this affects the ability for gtest to handle bugs 
> or crashes in the JVM, nor do I really have any idea about any such 
> consequences. This PR is opened more to start a discussion than with the 
> intention of just integrating this.

Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional 
commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'master' into no-gtest-ehsc
 - 8365231: Don't build gtest with /EHsc

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26721/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26721/files/69ad27ec..f2127bb3

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=26721&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=26721&range=00-01

  Stats: 57704 lines in 1959 files changed: 33331 ins; 15569 del; 8804 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26721.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26721/head:pull/26721

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26721

Reply via email to