build-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: JDK-8354316 : clang/linux build fails with -Wunused-result warning at XToolkit.c:695:9 [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8354316 : clang/linux build fails with -Wunused-result warning at XToolkit.c:695:9 [v3] Harshitha Onkar
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8354316 : clang/linux build fails with -Wunused-result warning at XToolkit.c:695:9 [v3] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8354316 : clang/linux build fails with -Wunused-result warning at XToolkit.c:695:9 [v3] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Integrated: JDK-8354316 : clang/linux build fails with -Wunused-result warning at XToolkit.c:695:9 Harshitha Onkar
• RFR: 8327466: ct.sym zip not reproducible across build environment timezones Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8327466: ct.sym zip not reproducible across build environment timezones Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8327466: ct.sym zip not reproducible across build environment timezones Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8327466: ct.sym zip not reproducible across build environment timezones Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8327466: ct.sym zip not reproducible across build environment timezones Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8355798: Implement JEP 514: Ahead-of-Time Command Line Ergonomics [v7] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8355798: Implement JEP 514: Ahead-of-Time Command Line Ergonomics [v7] Dan Heidinga
• RFR: 8356820: fixpath should allow + in paths on Windows Chihiro Ito
  • Re: RFR: 8356820: fixpath should allow + in paths on Windows Erik Joelsson
  • Integrated: 8356820: fixpath should allow + in paths on Windows Chihiro Ito
  • Re: RFR: 8356820: fixpath should allow + in paths on Windows Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Re: RFR: 8355798: Implement JEP 514: Ahead-of-Time Command Line Ergonomics [v6] Ioi Lam
• Re: RFR: 8355798: Implement JEP 514: Ahead-of-Time Command Line Ergonomics [v5] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8355798: Implement JEP 514: Ahead-of-Time Command Line Ergonomics [v5] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8355798: Implement JEP 514: Ahead-of-Time Command Line Ergonomics [v5] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8355798: Implement JEP 514: Ahead-of-Time Command Line Ergonomics [v5] Ekaterina Pavlova
• RFR: 8356686: doc/building.html is not up to date after JDK-8301971 Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8356686: doc/building.html is not up to date after JDK-8301971 Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8356686: doc/building.html is not up to date after JDK-8301971 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8356686: doc/building.html is not up to date after JDK-8301971 Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8356686: doc/building.html is not up to date after JDK-8301971 Kim Barrett
  • Integrated: 8356686: doc/building.html is not up to date after JDK-8301971 Kim Barrett
• RFR: 8356657: Use stable source-date for cmp-baseline jib profiles Mikael Vidstedt
  • Re: RFR: 8356657: Use stable source-date for cmp-baseline jib profiles Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8356657: Use stable source-date for cmp-baseline jib profiles Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8356657: Use stable source-date for cmp-baseline jib profiles Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8356657: Use stable source-date for cmp-baseline jib profiles Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8356657: Use stable source-date for cmp-baseline jib profiles Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8356657: Use stable source-date for cmp-baseline jib profiles Mikael Vidstedt
  • Integrated: 8356657: Use stable source-date for cmp-baseline jib profiles Mikael Vidstedt
• RFR: 8356656: Drop unused DEVKIT_HOME from jib-profiles.js Mikael Vidstedt
  • Re: RFR: 8356656: Drop unused DEVKIT_HOME from jib-profiles.js Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8356656: Drop unused DEVKIT_HOME from jib-profiles.js Mikael Vidstedt
  • Re: RFR: 8356656: Drop unused DEVKIT_HOME from jib-profiles.js [v2] Mikael Vidstedt
  • Re: RFR: 8356656: Drop unused DEVKIT_HOME from jib-profiles.js [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8356656: Drop unused DEVKIT_HOME from jib-profiles.js [v2] Mikael Vidstedt
  • Integrated: 8356656: Drop unused DEVKIT_HOME from jib-profiles.js Mikael Vidstedt
• RFR: 8356229: cmp-baseline build fail due to lib/modules difference Calvin Cheung
  • Re: RFR: 8356229: cmp-baseline build fail due to lib/modules difference Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8356229: cmp-baseline build fail due to lib/modules difference Calvin Cheung
  • Re: RFR: 8356229: cmp-baseline build fail due to lib/modules difference Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8356229: cmp-baseline build fail due to lib/modules difference Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8356229: cmp-baseline build fail due to lib/modules difference Calvin Cheung
• RFR: 8347570: Configure fails on macOS if directory name do not have correct case Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8347570: Configure fails on macOS if directory name do not have correct case [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8347570: Configure fails on macOS if directory name do not have correct case [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8347570: Configure fails on macOS if directory name do not have correct case Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Integrated: 8347570: Configure fails on macOS if directory name do not have correct case Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8356571: Re-enable -Wtype-limits for GCC in LCMS Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8356571: Re-enable -Wtype-limits for GCC in LCMS Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8356571: Re-enable -Wtype-limits for GCC in LCMS Phil Race
  • Integrated: 8356571: Re-enable -Wtype-limits for GCC in LCMS Sergey Bylokhov
• RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leo Korinth
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leo Korinth
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leo Korinth
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leo Korinth
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leo Korinth
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leo Korinth
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leo Korinth
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leo Korinth
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leo Korinth
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leo Korinth
  • Re: RFR: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leo Korinth
  • Withdrawn: 8356171: Increase timeout for testcases as preparation for change of default timeout factor Leo Korinth
• RFR: 8354278: Revert use of non-POSIX echo -n introduced in JDK-8301197 Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354278: Revert use of non-POSIX echo -n introduced in JDK-8301197 Iris Clark
  • Integrated: 8354278: Revert use of non-POSIX echo -n introduced in JDK-8301197 Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8351029: IncludeCustomExtension does not work on cygwin with source code below /home Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351029: IncludeCustomExtension does not work on cygwin with source code below /home Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8351029: IncludeCustomExtension does not work on cygwin with source code below /home Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351029: IncludeCustomExtension does not work on cygwin with source code below /home Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351029: IncludeCustomExtension does not work on cygwin with source code below /home Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351029: IncludeCustomExtension does not work on cygwin with source code below /home [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351029: IncludeCustomExtension does not work on cygwin with source code below /home [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351029: IncludeCustomExtension does not work on cygwin with source code below /home [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8351029: IncludeCustomExtension does not work on cygwin with source code below /home [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Integrated: 8351029: IncludeCustomExtension does not work on cygwin with source code below /home Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8334391: JDK build should exclude *-files directories for Java source Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8334391: JDK build should exclude *-files directories for Java source Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8334391: JDK build should exclude *-files directories for Java source Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8334391: JDK build should exclude *-files directories for Java source [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8334391: JDK build should exclude *-files directories for Java source [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8334391: JDK build should exclude *-files directories for Java source [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Integrated: 8334391: JDK build should exclude *-files directories for Java source Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8244533: Configure should abort on missing short names in Windows Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8244533: Configure should abort on missing short names in Windows Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8244533: Configure should abort on missing short names in Windows [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8244533: Configure should abort on missing short names in Windows [v3] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8244533: Configure should abort on missing short names in Windows [v3] Erik Joelsson
  • Integrated: 8244533: Configure should abort on missing short names in Windows Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8356379: Need a proper way to test existence of binary from configure Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Integrated: 8356379: Need a proper way to test existence of binary from configure Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8356379: Need a proper way to test existence of binary from configure Erik Joelsson
• RFR: 8356335: Remove linux-x86 from jib profiles Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8356335: Remove linux-x86 from jib profiles [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8356335: Remove linux-x86 from jib profiles [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Integrated: 8356335: Remove linux-x86 from jib profiles Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v13] Brian Burkhalter
• Withdrawn: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava duke
• RFR: 8356226: JCov Grabber server didn't respond Alexandre Iline
  • Re: RFR: 8356226: JCov Grabber server didn't respond [v2] Alexandre Iline
  • Re: RFR: 8356226: JCov Grabber server didn't respond [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Integrated: 8356226: JCov Grabber server didn't respond Alexandre Iline
• RFR: 8355962: RISCV64 cross build fails after 8354996 Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355962: RISCV64 cross build fails after 8354996 Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8355962: RISCV64 cross build fails after 8354996 Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355962: RISCV64 cross build fails after 8354996 Man Cao
  • Integrated: 8355962: RISCV64 cross build fails after 8354996 Chen Liang
• RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v4] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v4] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v3] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v4] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v5] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v6] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v6] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v6] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v6] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v6] Kevin Rushforth
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v7] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v7] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v7] Kevin Rushforth
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v7] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v7] Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v7] Kevin Rushforth
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v8] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v9] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 [v9] Iris Clark
  • Integrated: 8355746: Start of release updates for JDK 26 Nizar Benalla
• RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v5] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v5] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v5] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v10] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v5] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v2] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v3] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v4] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v5] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v5] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v5] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v6] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v7] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v8] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v9] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v10] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v10] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v10] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v10] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v11] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v12] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v12] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v12] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v12] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v12] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk [v12] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8355452: GHA: Test jtreg tier1 on linux-x64 static-jdk Jiangli Zhou
• RFR: 8354556: Expand value-based class warnings to java.lang.ref API Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: 8354556: Expand value-based class warnings to java.lang.ref API Chen Liang

• Earlier messages
• Later messages