On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:35:42 GMT, Weijun Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> We can - this was mostly just an attempt to avoid changing MacOS for the >> sake of a library name - I also wasn't sure if this might lead to other >> packaging changes/issues for people who package JVMs for MacOS? My original >> approach had a single name, so it would straightforward to make this happen. >> What do you think? > > I don't have a strong opinion. This is internal structure, but you're right > if someone tries to package a macOS-only JVM they would need some change. If > we want this feature to be backported, maybe it's safe to keep using the old > name. I can only speak for myself/my employer, but we would find utility in this feature being backported for sure. I'll leave as-is for now, but happy to adjust in the future. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28075#discussion_r2522730226
