On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 21:21:58 GMT, Weijun Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Should we use the workaround I have proposed above until a better solution >> for [JDK-8336664](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336664) is available? >> Or are there other suggestions? > > @TheRealMDoerr I haven't used your `calling_convention_requires_int_as_long` > flag in my new commit. Can you investigate the approach in a different JBS > issue? I would prefer to have no undefined behavior from the beginning. However, if you don't feed comfortable with it, we could file a follow-up issue. I don't think there's much to investigate because there's no alternative before we get [JDK-8336664](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336664). ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28931#discussion_r2693634221
