On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:20:00 GMT, David Simms <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This is a "*sub-review pull request*" for the first >> [preview](https://openjdk.org/jeps/12) of [JEP 401: Value Classes and >> Objects](https://openjdk.org/jeps/401), specifically >> [JDK-8317279](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317279): Standard library >> implementation of value classes and objects >> >>> [!NOTE] >>> This pull request and the other sub-review pull requests listed below are >>> based on the "*master pull request*" >>> (https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31120). It contains the same full set >>> of code changes as the "*master pull request*" to preserve the full >>> implementation context; the language compiler, JVM, and standard library >>> changes are intertwined. This separate pull requests exist only to >>> subdivide the review and related discussion by area. >> >> Other areas for review: >> >> - [JDK-8317277](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317277): Java language >> implementation of value classes and objects >> - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31121 >> - [JDK-8317278](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317278): JVM >> implementation of value classes and objects >> - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31122 >> >> Code changes resulting from the review process should be made in >> [`valhalla/lworld`](https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/). >> >> `valhalla/lworld` is currently updated from `jdk/master` whenever a weekly >> [`jdk` tag](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/tags) is created. At that time, >> code changes from `valhalla/lworld` will be propagated to the master pull >> request and to all sub-review pull requests, including this one. >> >> Ultimately, review sign-off will be recorded on the "*master pull request*", >> and this pull request will be closed without integration. >> >> This pull request has a large code surface area and often conflicts with >> `jdk/master` on a daily basis. Refer to >> [`valhalla/lworld`](https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/) for the latest >> state of the project code, keeping in mind that it may lag several days >> behind `jdk/master`. Both repositories may be needed as references during >> review. >> >> --------- >> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the >> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). > > David Simms has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 2798 commits: > > - Merge remote-tracking branch 'valhalla/lworld' into > jep401_sub_review_8317279 > - 8386239: [lworld] Update jdk/java/util/Arrays/ArraysEqCmpTest.java > > Reviewed-by: liach > - 8386242: [lworld] Simplify and clarify StrictProcessor > > Reviewed-by: dsimms > - 8386140: [lworld] FieldReflector using wrong Class argument > > Reviewed-by: alanb, dsimms > - 8386216: [lworld] Rollback meaningless diff in EventClassBuilder > > Reviewed-by: dsimms > - 8385170: [lworld] Serialization spec needs to allow abstract value classes > like Number > > Reviewed-by: liach > - 8385980: [lworld] Standardize pattern for preview value class generation > > Reviewed-by: liach > - 8386086: [lworld] > sun/jvmstat/monitor/MonitoredVm/MonitorVmStartTerminate.java should be > removed from problem list > > Reviewed-by: liach, dcubed > - Merge > > Merge jdk-28+1 > - 8386090: [lworld] Redundant test changes in lworld versus mainline > > Reviewed-by: vromero > - ... and 2788 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/92298786...4d6d2888 test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/defineHiddenClass/BasicTest.java line 310: > 308: assertTrue(hc.isHidden()); > 309: // ACC_SUPER bit may appear spuriously if preview is enabled > 310: assertEquals(hc.getModifiers() & (~ACC_SUPER), (ACC_PUBLIC | > accessFlags)); Chen - do you remember why this comment was added? The method source emptyClasses doesn't have any value classes so I expect IDENTITY to be set for empty classes that aren't interfaces when preview is enabled. Asking about "spuriously" suggests something random is going on. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31123#discussion_r3395454825
