On Mon, 29 Jun 2026 01:22:01 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ah, yes, that makes sense. _pac_mask comes from the core file, not the JVM >> SA is running on. >> >> I do wonder how debuggers deal with transported cores since they won't have >> access to something like _pac_mask. > > Debuggers (e.g. GDB) seem to refer `NT_ARM_PAC_MASK` in note section in > coredump. > https://docs.kernel.org/arch/arm64/pointer-authentication.html > > Should we also refer it in SA? If so, we need to fix to do so in > AARCH64Frame, but it is out of scope of this issue. (We need to consider > Windows and Mac if we modify AARCH64Frame) That's good to know, but I don't think you need to use NT_ARM_PAC_MASK if what you currently have is working well. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31669#discussion_r3494325884
