Ah, gotcha. I'll take a look and see if there's a maintainable way to
handle this...
On Dec 7, 2014 12:52 PM, "Steve Loughran" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 7 December 2014 at 20:42, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Actually, it is by design - we'd like to avoid having to manually install
> > JVMs on every slave when possible. The auto-installing JDKs from the drop
> > down are the preferred way to handle this - if you need a new JDK added
> > there, open a BUILDS ticket.
> >
> >
> fine, but you aren't answer the question
>
> why does the link to "latest" not point to the latest JDK on the target
> machines.
>
> That's not a versioning problem, it's a path maintenance problem
>
>
> > A.
> > On Dec 7, 2014 10:09 AM, "Gavin McDonald" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 07/12/2014, at 3:49 PM, Steve Loughran <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > while dealing with some fun moving hadoop-patch-test Jenkins to java
> 7,
> > > one
> > > > thing that I can see is that the symlinks of latests java versions
> > aren't
> > > >
> > > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        39 Oct  6 22:40 latest ->
> > > > /home/jenkins/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_45-64
> > > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        13 Jul 23  2011 latest1.4 ->
> > > j2sdk1.4.2_19
> > > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 23  2011 latest1.5 ->
> > > jdk1.5.0_22-32
> > > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 23  2011 latest1.5-32 ->
> > > > jdk1.5.0_22-32
> > > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 23  2011 latest1.5-64 ->
> > > > jdk1.5.0_22-64
> > > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 May 14  2013 latest1.6 ->
> > > jdk1.6.0_45-32
> > > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 May 14  2013 latest1.6-32 ->
> > > > jdk1.6.0_45-32
> > > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 May 14  2013 latest1.6-64 ->
> > > > jdk1.6.0_45-64
> > > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 31  2013 latest1.7 ->
> > > jdk1.7.0_25-32
> > > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 31  2013 latest1.7-32 ->
> > > > jdk1.7.0_25-32
> > > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 31  2013 latest1.7-64 ->
> > > > jdk1.7.0_25-64
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > With the actual versions installed:
> > > >
> > > > drwxr-xr-x  9 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.5.0_17-32
> > > > drwxr-xr-x  9 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.5.0_17-64
> > > > drwxr-xr-x  9 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.5.0_22-32
> > > > drwxr-xr-x  9 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.5.0_22-64
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.6.0_11-32
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.6.0_11-64
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.6.0_20-32
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011
> > > > jdk1.6.0_20-32-unlimited-security
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.6.0_20-64
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Oct 16  2011 jdk1.6.0_27-32
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Oct 16  2011 jdk1.6.0_27-64
> > > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Mar 26  2013 jdk1.6.0_45-32
> > > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Mar 26  2013 jdk1.6.0_45-64
> > > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Oct  3  2012 jdk1.7.0_04
> > > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jun  6  2013 jdk1.7.0_25-32
> > > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jun  6  2013 jdk1.7.0_25-64
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jun 27  2011 jdk1.7.0-32
> > > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Mar 18  2014 jdk1.7.0_55
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jun 27  2011 jdk1.7.0-64
> > > >
> > > > drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Mar  4  2014 jdk1.8.0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Are these latest/ links explicitly frozen, or simply have been
> > > > neglected for a while?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Neglected I would Imagine. They are different on many machines, and
> also
> > > the
> > > drop-down options in the master gui config don't match.
> > >
> > > As this is not a 5 minute fix, is it possible you can create a BUILDS
> > jira
> > > so someone
> > > can go through this ?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Gav…
> > >
> > > >
> > > > -steve
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > entity
> > > to
> > > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > reader
> > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified
> > > that
> > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > > immediately
> > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

Reply via email to