On 07/12/2014, at 8:53 PM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ah, gotcha. I'll take a look and see if there's a maintainable way to
> handle this…

In the meantime, can we still have a jira BUILDS ticket so we can track its 
progress 
and the cure etc ?

Thanks

Gav…

> On Dec 7, 2014 12:52 PM, "Steve Loughran" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 7 December 2014 at 20:42, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Actually, it is by design - we'd like to avoid having to manually install
>>> JVMs on every slave when possible. The auto-installing JDKs from the drop
>>> down are the preferred way to handle this - if you need a new JDK added
>>> there, open a BUILDS ticket.
>>> 
>>> 
>> fine, but you aren't answer the question
>> 
>> why does the link to "latest" not point to the latest JDK on the target
>> machines.
>> 
>> That's not a versioning problem, it's a path maintenance problem
>> 
>> 
>>> A.
>>> On Dec 7, 2014 10:09 AM, "Gavin McDonald" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 07/12/2014, at 3:49 PM, Steve Loughran <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> while dealing with some fun moving hadoop-patch-test Jenkins to java
>> 7,
>>>> one
>>>>> thing that I can see is that the symlinks of latests java versions
>>> aren't
>>>>> 
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        39 Oct  6 22:40 latest ->
>>>>> /home/jenkins/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_45-64
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        13 Jul 23  2011 latest1.4 ->
>>>> j2sdk1.4.2_19
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 23  2011 latest1.5 ->
>>>> jdk1.5.0_22-32
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 23  2011 latest1.5-32 ->
>>>>> jdk1.5.0_22-32
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 23  2011 latest1.5-64 ->
>>>>> jdk1.5.0_22-64
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 May 14  2013 latest1.6 ->
>>>> jdk1.6.0_45-32
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 May 14  2013 latest1.6-32 ->
>>>>> jdk1.6.0_45-32
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 May 14  2013 latest1.6-64 ->
>>>>> jdk1.6.0_45-64
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 31  2013 latest1.7 ->
>>>> jdk1.7.0_25-32
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 31  2013 latest1.7-32 ->
>>>>> jdk1.7.0_25-32
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 jenkins jenkins        14 Jul 31  2013 latest1.7-64 ->
>>>>> jdk1.7.0_25-64
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> With the actual versions installed:
>>>>> 
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  9 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.5.0_17-32
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  9 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.5.0_17-64
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  9 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.5.0_22-32
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  9 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.5.0_22-64
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.6.0_11-32
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.6.0_11-64
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.6.0_20-32
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011
>>>>> jdk1.6.0_20-32-unlimited-security
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jul 23  2011 jdk1.6.0_20-64
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Oct 16  2011 jdk1.6.0_27-32
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Oct 16  2011 jdk1.6.0_27-64
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Mar 26  2013 jdk1.6.0_45-32
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Mar 26  2013 jdk1.6.0_45-64
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Oct  3  2012 jdk1.7.0_04
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jun  6  2013 jdk1.7.0_25-32
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jun  6  2013 jdk1.7.0_25-64
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jun 27  2011 jdk1.7.0-32
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Mar 18  2014 jdk1.7.0_55
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 10 jenkins jenkins      4096 Jun 27  2011 jdk1.7.0-64
>>>>> 
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x  8 jenkins jenkins      4096 Mar  4  2014 jdk1.8.0
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are these latest/ links explicitly frozen, or simply have been
>>>>> neglected for a while?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Neglected I would Imagine. They are different on many machines, and
>> also
>>>> the
>>>> drop-down options in the master gui config don't match.
>>>> 
>>>> As this is not a 5 minute fix, is it possible you can create a BUILDS
>>> jira
>>>> so someone
>>>> can go through this ?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> Gav…
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -steve
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>>> entity
>>>> to
>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
>> confidential,
>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
>>> reader
>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>> notified
>>>> that
>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>>>> immediately
>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>> 

Reply via email to