On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Mike McLean wrote:
> On 02/10/2010 03:41 PM, Roland McGrath wrote: >> I'd certainly like it to be de rigeur for all the canonical forms of >> producing a passel of rpms. A directory full of fresh built rpms that is >> not directly usable as a repo is just silly! > > Not every set of rpms makes sense as a repo. > > If you really feel this way, perhaps you should request that yum support > a dir of rpms as a repo. ;) repoquery --repofrompath and the yum tmprepo plugin. -sv -- buildsys mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
