On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 16:09 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Mike McLean wrote: > > > On 02/10/2010 03:41 PM, Roland McGrath wrote: > >> I'd certainly like it to be de rigeur for all the canonical forms of > >> producing a passel of rpms. A directory full of fresh built rpms that is > >> not directly usable as a repo is just silly! > > > > Not every set of rpms makes sense as a repo. > > > > If you really feel this way, perhaps you should request that yum support > > a dir of rpms as a repo. ;) > > repoquery --repofrompath and the yum tmprepo plugin. > > -sv
I agree with Seth that there would be significant utility in having repodata readily available for brew builds. I suggest that for regular builds the repodata live at /data/repodata within the package dir. For scratch builds, the repodata directory could live right inside the task_123456 dir. I think Mike is right that if we do add repodata creation, having it on the hub would make the most sense. Cheers -- Dennis -- buildsys mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
