On Tue April 10 2007 18:49, Larry Brigman wrote: > On 4/10/07, Robin Farine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] > > It looks like the real problem lies in the compiler, NULL is > > perfectly valid here. What warning does the compiler spit out? > > It is a warning not an error but when Wall is set busybox config > sets Werror which > turns this warning into a build error. > > Output of make V=1 > mips64_octeon_be-gcc -Wp,-MD,coreutils/.touch.o.d -std=gnu99 [...] > coreutils/touch.c:44: warning: null argument where non-null > required (arg 2) I wonder, how does it know that a non-null arg is required here ? Robin _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
