> > It could make sense to remove hush if msh is a little bigger than > > hush and maintain lash in order to have a very very small shell for > > very tiny devices. > > This will leave me without shell which is small enough to be understndable > by mere mortals yet capable of some advanced stuff (like if/then).
wasn't rob working on a new shell? did he make it available anywhere? i only ask because it might be at least as capable as lash at this point. paul =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
