On 5/23/07, Bernhard Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >wasn't rob working on a new shell? did he make it available > >anywhere? i only ask because it might be at least as capable as > >lash at this point. > > see shells/bbsh.c > > Will need an indent and could use the patch that i sent to the list ages > ago to make it a bit smaller and fix a glitch or two. > > Ideally, hush should be tweaked to allow for just the very, very basic > duty of a shell, with if/else, case, etc being config options, at least > from my POV. Once this is done, rm bbsh and lash, i suppose.
hush in current svn: if/else is already configurable, case is not supported. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
