Hi seb, yes the mail was received but noone had time sofar to investigate the problem
re, wh Seb wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry to insist, but as I don't see any reaction to my precedent mail, > I'd just want to know if it wasn't well delivered on the list or > if it's just an (uninteresting|desperated) case so that there is nothing > to say. :) > > Le Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:34:39 +0200 > Seb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: > >> Hello, >> >> It seems that there is a bug in the 'jobs' built-in command of ash. As >> a matter of fact, its output cannot be captured nor piped. >> >> I made a little script (in attachment) which shows the case. If you >> execute it with ash, you should see that 'test3' doesn't return >> anything but a new line, while 'test4' indicates that the output is well >> directed to stdout (so, according to the rules of shell, the pipe >> should work). >> >> [...] > > ++ > Seb. > _______________________________________________ > busybox mailing list > [email protected] > http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox > > > _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
