On Saturday 14 July 2007 21:45, Natanael Copa wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 16:57 +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > > Original vim shows "permission denied" but "Read-only" is better than > > > nothing. > > > > Nice. Any chance getting "[Read failed]" (or whatever non-puzzling msg) > > so we don't need to return to this once more? > > Code is messy and unreadable and even small changes tend to require > redesign. (there are 3 different way how files are read and all 3 are > handled different) > > I think maybe I should start with renaming the global vars. What does > "cfn" mean?
On the positive side, it's not that bad. It could have been named "_". > Yes. I want this so bad so I spent some time to be able to add the > feature and reduce size at the same time to increase my chances to get > that specific feature in. > > I can make it a config option if you want, but for -12 bytes i thought I > could get it for free ;-) No, 12 bytes is ok. Applied to svn as-is. Thanks. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
