> > The attatched patch should not make things worse. If somebody find out > > that it introduces new bugs or have suggestions to improvements of the > > patch, let me know and I'll try to fix. > > Wow. thanks!
i agree. busybox vi has needed some work. > Applied to svn with minor changes. For example, we were comparing argv[0] > with "view", but argv[0] can be "/bin/view"! Right thing is > > strncmp(appliet_name, "view", 4) > > BTW, any idea why strNcmp? Can it really be "viewsomething"? I'm no expert > on vi... no. it should be "vi", "ex", or "view". (and busybox's vi will almost certainly never be called "ex". :-) paul =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
