> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:40:11PM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: > > It would be a lot easier for me to have the ip application in the same > > place as the original iproute2. In fact it makes things alot more easy > > to have the busybox applications in the same place as the original apps. > > (not first time i meet this kind of problems) > > $PATH?
no, his problem is that other apps refer to ip via its full path. $PATH isn't always the answer. while i have no objection to having busybox put things in their standard places, i'd also point out that it's easy to fix this problem, via an early init.d script -- just move the ip app, or create a new link to it. paul =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
