> > Should not we use pdq: http://pdq.sourceforge.net ??? > > btw: i have no idea was pdq is, and i can not reach sf since yesterday. >
pdq is a non-queueing printing system -- the assumption being that in most places, there isn't all that much contention for the printer, and it will usually be available for printing. so you print your job, and if the printer isn't available it is retried for a while, but then the command gives up -- after all, you'll go fix the printer, or find out what's wrong, and try again. it saves a copy of your job in your home dir for a while (days) in case it's hard to reproduce, but it won't be retried. there's no central queue or spool of print jobs, and no central server. every client just tries the printer directly. (i think the "printer" can be an lpd server, but i'm not sure. but this is external to pdq.) i used it for years at home. now that i've upgraded all of my machines to recent ubuntu releases, and pdq isn't apt-available, i'm running CUPS, and it sure feels complicated in comparison to pdq. paul =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
