On Thursday 28 February 2008 03:06, Steven Bradshaw wrote: > I thought ONESHOT was more descriptive, the timeout being a selectable > attribute > of the ONESHOT mode (but also enabling it). But calling it TIMEOUT is OK too. > Should I change the name and resubmit the patch or is acceptable as is?
Well, I have another problem with accepting it. You can achieve the same already: busybox nc -l -p 23 -e busybox telnetd -i NB: "standard" nc does not accept multi-argument command after -e, you'll need to wrap "telnetd -i" in a shell script. But busybox nc does accept it as shown above - I just tested it. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
