Sounds good. I'll get it a try. Thanks, sb
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Denys Vlasenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 28 February 2008 03:06, Steven Bradshaw wrote: > > I thought ONESHOT was more descriptive, the timeout being a selectable > attribute > > of the ONESHOT mode (but also enabling it). But calling it TIMEOUT is OK > too. > > Should I change the name and resubmit the patch or is acceptable as is? > > Well, I have another problem with accepting it. > You can achieve the same already: > > busybox nc -l -p 23 -e busybox telnetd -i > > NB: "standard" nc does not accept multi-argument > command after -e, you'll need to wrap "telnetd -i" > in a shell script. But busybox nc does accept it > as shown above - I just tested it. > -- > vda > _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
