I myself have been trying to get rid of /proc/acpi for some times. And
each time was forced to horn retreat. evdev support is too "raw"
yet...

So shall we try to put acpid into BB, folks? If so is acpid
sufficiently featured? Whether a new way of configuring actions is
acceptible or not (if not, can we rename it, say, to uacpid and let
live separately from acpid)?

I, of course, admit that this applet can be of limited use to be
injected in BB tree.

TIA,
--
Vladimir
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to