On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Rob Landley<[email protected]> wrote: > I've had infrastructure for that toybox for over a year. I have a big todo > item to port as much of the toybox infrastructure as I can back into BusyBox, > it's just not at the top of my todo list yet and it's a big thing I'll have to > do in stanges (and several bits of which are kind of intrusive requiring > documentation, explanation of the rationale, and probably extensive > discussion). > > First question: is the current test suite more closely maintained than the > documentation directory?
Yes. Regressions are not allowed (meaning, they are checked and fixed, it is not bit rotting). > (Is there somebody specific caring for it, or just > "when the maintainer has spare time"?) I don't remember anyone specifically focusing on just a part of busybox. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
